Inquiring minds want to know: These things aren't always what they seem to be.
It seems strange that not once in the narrative does the writer state that the dog was clearly identified as a service dog.
If the dog wasn't causing a disruption or posing a threat, once the dog had been absolutely identified as a service dog the customer service manager should have shut her mouth and moved on.
However if the owner couldn't or wouldn't produce any verification the manager was well within her rights.
Without proof in some form of documentation or obvious equipment, anyone could take a dog into a store and claim it's a service dog. How would a store manager be expected to know the difference?
Bookmarks